USPTO serial 75196725
MILLENNIUM 2000 COUNTDOWN CLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCNUTT, GEOFF
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLENNIUM 2000 COUNTDOWN CLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Roslyn Heights, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
LILE H DEINARD
LILE DEINARD DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP15TH FL250 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10177Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | countdown timekeeping devices | ABANDONED | Jul 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 23, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |