USPTO serial 75197080
TOREX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TOREX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THEODORE A. BREINER
THEODORE A BREINER BREINER & BREINER115 N HENRY STP O BOX 19290ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0290Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | providing information in the field of trading securities, interests in securities, options, futures and commodities | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | electronic transmission of messages and data in the field of trading securities, interests in securities, options, futures and commodities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 20, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 17, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 24, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2000 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 4, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |