USPTO serial 75197166
BIZTAINMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2469919Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 17, 2001
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BIZTAINMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158, JP
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158, JP
Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 158, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIKOLEAN Y MORGAN
MIKOLEAN Y MORGAN LONGACRE & WHITE1919 S EADS ST STE 401ARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software for outline processing, word processing, data analysis, statistics in the field of business and entertainment; computer software featuring games and fortunetelling; computer software for service units in the nature of data processors, terminal adapters, modems, data terminal equipment in the field of entertainment and business | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 16, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 29, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 5, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 13, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 12, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 19, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 20, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |