USPTO serial 75198406
ULTRAGRIP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ULTRAGRIP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GEORGE A ROLSTON
P O BOX 27TORONTO, ON M5H 3S1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | metal fasteners, namely, tee nut fasteners | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |