Drawing for URBAN ATHLETICS

USPTO serial 75199006

URBAN ATHLETICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TURNER, JASON FITZGERALD
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with URBAN ATHLETICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LAURA E GOLDBARD

LAURA E GOLDBARD STROOCK & STROOCK & LAVAN180 MAIDEN LNNEW YORK, NY 10038UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035retail shoe store servicesACTIVESep 24, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 19, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 18, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 12, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 27, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 11, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 4, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 15, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 22, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 19, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance