Drawing for T-SPOT

USPTO serial 75199458

T-SPOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BECK, LORETTA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with T-SPOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rita E. Kline

Rita E. Kline Renner, Otto, Boisselle & Sklar, LLP1621 Euclid AvenueFloor 19Cleveland, OH 44115

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009laboratory equipment for scientific use, namely, assay plates and images analyzersACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Oct 1, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 1, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 1, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Oct 1, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Jun 2, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 2, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Apr 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 6, 2000ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 1999EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Jun 16, 1999EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Jan 8, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Dec 16, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 2, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 16, 1998EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Dec 16, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 22, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 21, 1997CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jul 11, 1997CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Jun 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance