Drawing for SOHO COBBLER

USPTO serial 75199697

SOHO COBBLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOHO COBBLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT L TUCKER

160 E 84TH ST STE 5 ENEW YORK, NY 10028UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025men's women's and children's shoesACTIVENov 8, 1993

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 23, 2001PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jan 9, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Nov 7, 2000ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 22, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 2, 2000CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 3, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 21, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 6, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jul 13, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 11, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 23, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 17, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Mar 19, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 4, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance