USPTO serial 75200092
MVP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2165275Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 16, 1998
- Examiner
- TUCCILLO, SUSANA M.
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MVP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS R VIGIL
Thomas R. Vigil THOMAS R. VIGIL LAW OFFICES319 BLUFF COURTLAKE BARRINGTON, IL 60010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 017 | shaft seals, namely, automobile shaft seals made of elastomeric material and mounted between an inner metal sleeve and an outer metal shell, non-metal shaft seals for industrial application, and non-metal hydraulic and pneumatic shaft seals | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 16, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 16, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 17, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 12, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 21, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 13, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 1997 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 1997 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1997 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |