Drawing for INTERACTIVE PREASSEMBLY

USPTO serial 75200113

INTERACTIVE PREASSEMBLY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CLARK, GLENN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERACTIVE PREASSEMBLY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PATRICK R ROCHE

PATRICK R ROCHE FAY SHARPE BEALL FAGAN MINNICH & MCKEE1100 SUPERIOR AVE STE 700CLEVELAND, OH 44114-2518UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use by engineering and manufacturing companies to communicate product form and function through visualization or animation of product designACTIVENov 1, 1995

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 2, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 13, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 13, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 2, 1999CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 8, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 24, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 12, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance