Drawing for TORRENT NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 75200465

TORRENT NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with TORRENT NETWORKING TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SAVERY M GRADOVILLE

MELISSA MANWARING ESQ FENWICK & W LLP2 PALO ALTO SQSTE 800PALO ALTO, CA 94306

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009data communications computer hardware and computer software for use in implementing telecommunications and data networks, namely, software for bridging, routing, network analysis and ATM switching and for providing remote file arrangements between computersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 17, 1999ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 17, 1999OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Nov 17, 1999OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jul 1, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 7, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 14, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 13, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 6, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 15, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 22, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance