USPTO serial 75200475
VIDEO POKER GOLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIDEO POKER GOLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Westport, CT
Westport, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
IRAH H. DONNER
IRAH H DONNERTHE WILLARD OFFICE BLDG1455 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1008Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 23, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2002 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 30, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2002 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 20, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2001 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Jul 27, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 10, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 7, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 13, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 11, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 3, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 7, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |