Drawing for EQUINOVA

USPTO serial 75200548

EQUINOVA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EQUINOVA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE E O'CONNOR

BRUCE E O'CONNOR CHRISTENSEN O'CONNOR JOHNSON KINDNESS1420 FIFTH AVE STE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in data acquisition, database management, operating and controlling human machine interfaces, and for real-time supervisory control for use in the fields of industrial control applications, transportation and traffic control applications; vehicular simulators for use in training operations in the fields of transportation and heavy equipmentACTIVE—
035business program management services; market analysis, market research, and conducting marketing studies; business management and consultation; business marketing consulting services; business consultationACTIVE—
037installation of turnkey computer systemsACTIVE—
042value added serivices in the field of computer hardware aqnd software, namely, design of computer hardware modules which modify the computer hardware of others, updating and modification of software of others, and integration of computer systems and networks; consulting services in the field of farriery and veterinary medicine; development of computer software and hardware for real-time control, industrial process control, real-time simulation, and human-machine interface applications, for others; engineering services; product development servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2002ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 22, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 5, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 4, 2001EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 30, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 29, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 2, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 13, 2000IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Oct 12, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 20, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 25, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 24, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 14, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 11, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance