USPTO serial 75200816
EAST/WEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2976316Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- BENZMILLER, ANDREW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EAST/WEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Minneapolis, MN
SHERMAN OAKS, CA
Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas M. Small
THOMAS M SMALL BIRCH, STEWART, KOLASCH & BIRCH LLPPO BOX 747FALLS CHURCH, VA 22040-0747UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production of a weekly television show concerning the health industry and alternative medicine | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 6, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Holmberg Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EAST WEST MEDIA, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by Holmberg Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Holmberg Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named EAST/WEST
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Feb 1, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 2, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Apr 30, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 6, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 1, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 10, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 13, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 6, 2000 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 7, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 22, 1999 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |