USPTO serial 75201119
HOTEL MONACO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 13, 2001
- Examiner
- ZAK, HENRY
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with HOTEL MONACO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, Inc.
San Francisco, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, Inc.
Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, Inc.
San Francisco, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, Inc.
Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, Inc.
San Francisco, CA, US
Other trademarks owned by Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, Inc.
KIMPTON HOTEL & RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC
Atlanta, GA, US
Other trademarks owned by KIMPTON HOTEL & RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ashley H. Zito
Ashley H. Zito InterContinental Hotels GroupThree Ravinia Drive, Suite 100Atlanta, GA 30346United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | hotel services | ACTIVE | Jun 15, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Kimpton Hotel & Restaurant Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by KIMPTON HOTEL & RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named HOTEL MONACO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2026 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2026 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 10, 2026 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2023 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2011 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Sep 29, 2011 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 28, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 2, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 23, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 6, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 11, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 3, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |