Drawing for UNIVERSAL

USPTO serial 75202281

UNIVERSAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEORGE, ANIL V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with UNIVERSAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ANNE B NIELSEN

ANNE B NIELSEN UNIVERSAL CITY STUDIOS INC100 UNIVERSAL CITY PLZUNIVERSAL CITY, CA 91608UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toys and games, namely, action figures and accessories therefor; balloons; bathtub toys; toy building blocks; dolls and accessories therefor; doll clothing; board games; card games; play cosmetics for children; costume masks; miniature die cast vehicles; toy airplanes and helicopters; battery operated remote controlled toy vehicles; flying disk; inflatable vinyl figures; jigsaw puzzles; kites; marbles; indoor slumber and play tents; plush toys; hand-held puppets; sit-in and ride-on toy vehicles; model train sets; play shaving kits; skateboards; roller skates; toy banks; water squirting toys; toy pistols; target set comprising toy gun; toy suction darts, sponge discs and target; Christmas tree ornaments except confectionery or illumination articles; pinball and arcade game machines; hand held unit for playing electronic games and video game tape cassettes sold as a unit sold in association with and only at registrant's motion picture studios, amusement parks, themed entertainment venues, and on-line web siteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2001EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 26, 2001EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 23, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Sep 19, 2000OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Oct 21, 1999OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 26, 1999ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 11, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 6, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 18, 1999CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Sep 24, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 8, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 30, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance