Drawing for NATURAL SOLUTIONS

USPTO serial 75202535

NATURAL SOLUTIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KREHELY, KIM
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATURAL SOLUTIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sheetal B. Shah

SHEETAL B SHAH CROWELL & MORING1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2595UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035energy buying services, energy procurement and contracting servicesACTIVE
039distribution of energy, and transportation of natural gas by pipelineACTIVE
042providing energy management and consultation services, regulation and control of energy distribution, and energy capacity management services to residential, commercial and industrial users, namely, in the field of natural gas and electricityACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2002PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED
Jan 17, 2002PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED
Apr 18, 2001PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED
Mar 23, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2001EX2MSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED
Mar 23, 2001EX2DSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED
Jan 24, 2001EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jul 6, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
May 10, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jan 25, 2000NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 2, 1999IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Feb 2, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 10, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Sep 1, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 14, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 13, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 30, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 30, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 6, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 1, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance