USPTO serial 75202655
BELLE DE PROVENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 29, 2006
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BELLE DE PROVENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Thornhill, Ontario, CA
MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CA
MARKHAM, ONTARIO, CA
CONCORD, CA
MARKHAM ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Catherine M. Clayton
Catherine M. Clayton Gibbons P.C.One Pennsylvania Plaza, 37th FloorNew York, NY 10119-3701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Candles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 6, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by TANI INVESTMENTS INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 1462087 ONTARIO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by 1462087 ONTARIO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by BELLE DE PROVENCE INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TANI INVESTMENTS INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named BELLE DE PROVENCE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 15, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2006 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 28, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 2004 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 27, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 28, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 3, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 22, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 16, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |