USPTO serial 75203278
TRANSFORMATION SERVER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TRANSFORMATION SERVER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Markham, Ontario, CA
Markham, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN R GARBER
JOHN R GARBER COOPER & DUNHAM LLP1185 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in extraction, filtering, reformatting and replication of data between the compatible and incompatible database software and computer platforms | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jul 27, 2004 | PILM | PETITION INQUIRY LETTER ISSUED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 12, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 12, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 2, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 26, 2001 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 30, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 1, 2000 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 20, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 21, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 12, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 8, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |