Drawing for CAR FOOD

USPTO serial 75204310

CAR FOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CAR FOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

H KENNETH MERRITT JR

JANE OSBORNE MCKNIGHT MERRITT & MERRITT30 MAIN ST STE 330BURLINGTON, VT 05402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029crystallized fruit, processed dates, entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables, processed fruit, fruit chips, jerky, kefir, candied fruit snacks, crystallized ginger, package combinations consisting of cheese, meat and/or processed fruit, potato chips, processed pumpkin, sunflower and edible fruit and vegetable seeds, raisins, fruit and vegetable rinds, snack dips (excluding salsa and other sauces used as dips), dairy based beverages, namely, chocolate milk, strawberry milk and flavored milk drinks and other beverages used as milk substitutes, namely, flavored soy milk drinks and bean-based snack foodACTIVE—
030grain-based and herbal food beverages, tea, bakery goods, bakery products, caramels, cheese flavored puffed corn snacks, coffee, coffee substitutes, cookies, corn chips, corn curls, crackers, doughnuts, entrees consisting primarily of pasta or rice, ready to eat food bars, granola, mints, muffins, package combinations consisting of primarily bread, crackers and/or cookies, pretzels, puffed corn snacks, cheese flavored puffed corn snacks, rice based snack foods, tortilla chips, truffles (chocolate), wheat-based snack foods, brownies and cereal barsACTIVE—
032non-alcoholic and de-alcoholized drinks, namely, beer substitute, fruit drinks and fruit juices, syrups and preparations for making the above named beveragesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 6, 2001ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jan 6, 2001OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 17, 2000OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 9, 1998OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jul 2, 1998ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Jun 2, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 1, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 28, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 25, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 6, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 21, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance