USPTO serial 75205114
POWERLITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMIGA, HOWARD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with POWERLITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dorval, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PETER L COSTAS
PETER L COSTAS PEPE & HAZARD225 ASYLUM STHARTFORD, CT 06103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | electrical equipment, namely, street, outdoor and indoor high intensity discharge lighting fixtures sold individually and in installations including metal poles and brackets for such fixtures, outdoor lighting control relays, swithcgear for voltages 600 volts or less and power cable accessories sold as a unit | ACTIVE | Dec 1, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 17, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Aug 10, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 24, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |