USPTO serial 75205139
MENU RIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUCHANAN WILL, NORA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MENU RIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ringaskiddy County Cork, IE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORM D ST LANDAU
SUSAN ANTHONY TUCKER FLYER & LEWIS1615 L ST NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5612UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | full line of frozen foods, namely, hot and cold hors d'oevres and appetizers, namely, baked goods, namely, mini vegetable wraps, seafood cakes, mini turnovers, canapes, spring rolls, mini shrimp and spinach quiches, spanokopita, shrimp and beef and chicken kabobs, mini stuffed baked potatoes, cheese and cracker combinations, jalapeno and cheddar rings, jalapeno chicken fingers, salmon burgers, salmon, vegetable patties and stuffed potatoes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 14, 1999 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 8, 1999 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 11, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |