USPTO serial 75205267
HIGHLANDS RANCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 28, 1999
- Examiner
- KIM, RICHARD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HIGHLANDS RANCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Walnut, CA
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO
Highlands Ranch, CO
Highlands Ranch, CO
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Walnut, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert J. Itri
SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP8822 S RIDGELINE RDHIGHLANDS RANCH, CO 80126UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | construction services, namely, planning, laying out, and development of residential and commercial communities | EXPIRED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by Mission Viejo Company
- Other trademarks owned by Mission Viejo Company
- Other trademarks owned by SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks owned by SHEA HOMES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named HIGHLANDS RANCH
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 6, 2007 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 5, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 3, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |