USPTO serial 75205785
SEMPERFLEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 8, 2000
- Examiner
- VAVONESE, DANIEL P
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with SEMPERFLEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SEMPERIT TECHNISCHE PRODUKTE GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
A-1031 Vienna, AT
Other trademarks owned by SEMPERIT TECHNISCHE PRODUKTE GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
SEMPERIT TECHNISCHE PRODUKTE GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
AT
Other trademarks owned by SEMPERIT TECHNISCHE PRODUKTE GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
SEMPERIT TECHNISCHE PRODUKTE GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
A-1031 Vienna, AT
Other trademarks owned by SEMPERIT TECHNISCHE PRODUKTE GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcus Luepke
Marcus Luepke Muncy Geissler Olds Lowe, P.C.4000 LEGATO ROAD, SUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | hoses made of rubber and/or synthetic material for vehicles, namely, connecting hoses for motorboat and automobile radiators, and coolant hoses for motorboat and automobile engines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1977 |
| 012 | hoses made of rubber and/or synthetic material, namely, air brake hoses for motorboats and automobiles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 1, 1977 |
| 017 | hoses made of rubber and/or synthetic material, namely, hydraulic hot water hoses for use in the mining, automobile and robotics industries; food quality hoses for use in the food and beverage industries; abrasion resistant hoses for use in conveying particulate and granulate materials; oil hoses for use in conveying industrial oils, diesel oils, fuel oils, hydraulic oils and mineral oils; steam/hot water hoses for use in materials handling and processing industries and car repair workshops; chemical transfer hoses for use in the chemical industries, tank truck construction and agriculture; industrial water hoses for application in materials handling and processing industries, construction, agriculture and irrigation; and, compressed air hoses for use in all types of industries | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 1977 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SEMPERIT TECHNISCHE PRODUKTE GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
- Other trademarks owned by SEMPERIT TECHNISCHE PRODUKTE GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
- Other trademarks owned by SEMPERIT TECHNISCHE PRODUKTE GESELLSCHAFT M.B.H.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Similar marks named SEMPERFLEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2020 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 8, 2020 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Feb 8, 2020 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2020 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 27, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2019 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2010 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 30, 2010 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 30, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 26, 2010 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 8, 2006 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 8, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 7, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 20, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 10, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 9, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 26, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |