Drawing for RES-A-TRACK

USPTO serial 75205892

RES-A-TRACK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SANTOMARTINO, MARTHA L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RES-A-TRACK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David V. Radack

DAVID V RADACK ECKERT SEAMAN CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLCUSX TWR 600 GRANT ST 44TH FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in managing a database of health care providers, scheduling personnel and reporting to government agencies to facilitate reimbursementACTIVEMay 15, 1996

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 21, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 21, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jan 31, 2002CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Dec 3, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 8, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 23, 2001CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 16, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 10, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 17, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 25, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 11, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance