Drawing for A VERITUS COMPANY

USPTO serial 75206391

A VERITUS COMPANY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A VERITUS COMPANY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ARNOLD B SILVERMAN

600 GRANT ST 42ND FLPITTSBURGH, PA 15219UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036health and group disability insurance underwriting and administration services, the administration of employee welfare benefit plans, employee benefit consulting services, group life insurance underwriting and administration services, long-term care insurance underwriting and underwriting insurance for pre-paid legal insurance servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 30, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Jul 23, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 3, 1999EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 2, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 2, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance