Drawing for FOOT PLEASER

USPTO serial 75206728

FOOT PLEASER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEIPZIG, MARC J
Law office
OFFICE OF THE SOLICITOR

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOOT PLEASER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MARIA FRANEK ANGILERI

MARIA FRANEK ANGILERI BROOKS & KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR 22ND FLSOUTHFIELD, MI 48075UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010foot massagers and foot bathsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 7, 2000ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 20, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 20, 2000EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 2, 2000ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 2000EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Mar 25, 1999CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Feb 19, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 9, 1998CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Sep 10, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 10, 1998JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 7, 1998EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 19, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 5, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 24, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance