USPTO serial 75207755
DFS-LIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MERMELSTEIN, DAVID
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DFS-LIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ALEXANDER TOGNINO
DICKERSON M DOWNING MORGAN & FINNEGAN, LLP345 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10154UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs and related manuals sold as a unit for use in the field of information, file, and/or database sharing, across one or more computers (which may be either hosts, servers, or personal computers), within and across enterprises, located at one or more countries and cities | ABANDONED | Aug 5, 1996 |
| 016 | instruction manuals for use in the field of information, file, and/or database sharing, across one or more computers (which may be either hosts, servers, or personal computers), within and across enterprises, located at one or more countries and cities | ABANDONED | Aug 5, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 19, 1999 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 4, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 22, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 26, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |