USPTO serial 75208160
NATURAL GAS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURAL GAS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARY-ALICE POMPUTIUS
MARY-ALICE POMPUTIUS FOSTER PEPPER & SHEFELMAN1111 3RD AVE STE 3400SEATTLE, WA 98101-3299UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | refueling stations for natural gas-powered motor vehicles; retrofitting services, namely, installing and servicing of natural gas conversions for motor vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1999 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1999 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 2, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 1, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 2, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 18, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |