USPTO serial 75208201
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
Santa Clara, CA
ST. LAURENT, QUEBEC, CA
MONTREAL, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD FRANKLIN
FRANK S HISCOX DORSEY & WHITNEY LLPSTE 200850 HANSEY WAYPALO ALTO, CA 94304-1017| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | TELECOMMUNICATIONS ACCESS NETWORK COMPRISED OF COMPUTER HARDWARE, SOFTWARE AND PERIPHERALS, AND STATIONARY TRANSMITTERS, RECEIVING ANTENNAS AND TRANSCEIVERS, SOLD TO TELECOMMUNICATION INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDERS FOR THEIR USE IN BROADBAND WIRELESS, AND NOT RADIO TELEPHONE OR "CELLULAR", TRANSMISSION OF VIDEO, VOICE, AND DATA FROM A CENTRAL TRANSMISSION STATION TO FIXED POINT RECEIVERS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 29, 1998 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2008 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| May 14, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2006 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 29, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 29, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 24, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 28, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 22, 1999 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |