Drawing for MILLENNIUM ALLIANCE

USPTO serial 75208557

MILLENNIUM ALLIANCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUTTADAURO, JULIE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILLENNIUM ALLIANCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

BRUCE J. GOLDNER

BRUCE J. GOLDNER SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER & FLOM LLP919 THIRD AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009videos featuring issues of peace, justice, sustainable development, sustainable societies, and communities, youth and future, and about how to plan events and how to induce others to make charitable gifts in connection with the issues of peace, justice, sustainable development, sustainable societies, and communities, youth and futureACTIVE—
016publications, namely, books, articles, brochures all in connection with the issues of peace, justice, sustainable development, sustainable societies, and communities, youth and future, and about how to plan events and how to induce others to make charitable gifts in connection with the issues of peace, justice, sustainable development, sustainable societies, and communities, youth and the futureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 16, 2013UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Apr 22, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 3, 2012UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 18, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 24, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 4, 2012NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 18, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 15, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 9, 2012RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 21, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 18, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 15, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 2, 2010RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 2, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 2, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 2, 2009RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 2, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 1, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 28, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 27, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 27, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 19, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 19, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 12, 2006UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN—
Sep 1, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 1, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 19, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 29, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 1, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Mar 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 15, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 7, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 23, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Dec 3, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance