USPTO serial 75208764
PATENTS TO PRODUCTS TO PROFITS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 9, 2000
- Examiner
- BELENKER, ESTHER
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PATENTS TO PRODUCTS TO PROFITS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
Mountain View, CA
Mountain View, CA
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward A. Friedland
EDWARD A FRIEDLAND THE THOMSON CORPORATION1 STATION PLSTAMFORD, CT 06902UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AURIGIN SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SmartPatents, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by SmartPatents, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AURIGIN SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PATENTS TO PRODUCTS TO PROFITS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 23, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 9, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 8, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 4, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 14, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 1, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |