Drawing for RICHTER 2000

USPTO serial 75208789

RICHTER 2000

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEORGE, ANIL V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RICHTER 2000?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ

SIMOR L MOSKOWITZ JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERN PLLC400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-2201UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for use in the rental industry, namely, an automated merchandising system for the management of retail operation to help customers manage their business and take appropriate action by providing the customers with comprehensive management information, decision support and efficient operational systems; and instruction manuals therefor, sold as a unitACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 21, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 15, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 7, 1999CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 10, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 5, 1998CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 1, 1998ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 20, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance