USPTO serial 75208823
NETEYE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OSBORNE, STANLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NETEYE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
S-223 70 LUND, SE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B LASKY
3100 NORWEST CTR90 S 7TH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-4131Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer and telecommunications apparatus and instruments, namely, digital video cameras, digital still cameras, video to digital converters, video to Internet interfaces; computers; data processing equipment, namely, analog digital convertes, protocol converters, video cameras; software in the field of telecommunications and image transmission software | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | printed articles, namely, manuals for computer hardware | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 1999 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |