USPTO serial 75209841
SKULLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, CRAIG
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SKULLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Bronxville, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DOREEN L COSTA
GREGORY SPEIRS808 BRONX RIVER RDBRONXVILLE, NY 10708UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | tee shirts, jackets, shorts, boxer shorts, sweatshirts, sweatpants, neckties, tank top shirts, socks, sneakers | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2000 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 28, 1998 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 10, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 18, 1997 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 22, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 28, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |