USPTO serial 75210046
PEDIGREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PEDIGREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cristina A. Carvalho
CRISTINA A CARVALHO ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | ALL PURPOSE CLEANING PREPARATIONS; FURNITURE POLISH; SCOURING POWDERS; SKIN ABRASIVE PREPARATIONS; BODY SOAPS; SOAPS FOR CLEANING PETS; PERFUMES; ESSENTIAL OILS FOR PERSONAL USE; COSMETICS, NAMELY EYE AND FACE MAKEUP; FACIAL AND BODY CLEANSERS; HAIR LOTIONS; DENTRIFICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MARS, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks owned by Kal Kan Foods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MARS, INCORPORATED
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named PEDIGREE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 17, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 10, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 18, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 28, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2000 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 8, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |