USPTO serial 75210294
RAILCAM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAILCAM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Flamborough, Ontario L9H 7L8, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAULA J KRASNY
PAULA J KRASNY MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY227 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | cameras, namely, video cameras, 35mm film cameras and 70mm film cameras, stabilized camera mounts, sensors, namely, infra red detectors and sonar auto focus sensors, stabilized sensor platforms; and guide systems comprising a track or monorail for the movement of cameras, stabilized camera mounts, sensors, stabilized sensor platforms and mounts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | installation of guide systems comprising a track or monorail for the movement of stabilized cameras, stabilized sensors and mounts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design services for others in the field of guide systems for the movement of stabilized cameras, stabilized sensors and mounts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 24, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2000 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| May 24, 2000 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| May 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |