USPTO serial 75210730
PURCEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURCEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN
JOHN CLARKE HOLMAN JACOBSON PRICE HOLMAN & STERNTHE JENIFER BLDG400 SEVENTH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | chemical products, namely, compounds and admixtures used for sealing, insulating and filling in the building and manufacturing industries; admixtures for concrete and mortars; binding agents in the nature of chemicals and admixtures for use in the building and manufacturing industries; sealing and insulating materials, namely, chemical compounds and admixtures used for the building and manufacturing industries; gap filling compositions, namely, chemical compounds and admixtures used for the building and manufacturing industries | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | seals used for expansion gaps and construction joints; sealing compounds used for sound and moisture prevention in the building and manufacturing industries; moisture insulating materials, namely, polyurethane film for use as a moisture barrier used in the building industry; laminated plastic sheets for use in the manufacture of countertops; waterproof plastic sheeting used for roofing and tunneling | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | three component polyurethane resin floor screed; concrete; mortar; plaster material, namely, plaster and stucco; cement and cement mixes for the construction industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Sika AG, vorm. Kaspar Winkler & Co.
- Other trademarks owned by Sika AG, vorm. Kaspar Winkler & Co.
- Other trademarks in Class 001
- Other trademarks in Class 017
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named PURCEM
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 7, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 8, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 9, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |