USPTO serial 75212290
PERSONAL CAR LOCATOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PERSONAL CAR LOCATOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Philadelphia, PA
Philadelphia, PA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD R PIPER JR
DONALD R PIPER JR DANN, DORFMAN, HERRELL & SKILLMAN, PC1601 MARKET ST STE 2400PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2307UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | marker for increasing the visibility of a vehicle, namely, plastic rods and plastic rods with a LED display | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 19, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 12, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 26, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 17, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 16, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 26, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 26, 1998 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |