USPTO serial 75212305
SMITKIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SMITKIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NANETTE M NORTON
NANETTE M NORTON BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | pumps, air compressors, blowers for engines and parts therefor; aircraft engines and boat engines and parts therefor; internal combustion engines for machine apparatus and replacement parts therefor; transmissions for machines and transmissions other than for land vehicles and parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | motors and egnines for land vehicles and parts therefor; stationery engines, namely, prime movers for industrial and agricultural plants and parts therefor; transmissions for land vehicles and parts therefor | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Smitkin Engine Co. Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Smitkin Engine Co. Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named SMITKIN
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 31, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2000 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 7, 1999 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 12, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 13, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 19, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 23, 1998 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 27, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |