USPTO serial 75213261
US BASIC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3059229Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 14, 2006
- Examiner
- CORDOVA, RAUL
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with US BASIC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Stamford, CT
Stamford, CT
Roelofarendsveen, NL
Stamford, CT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MICHAEL B LASKY
MICHAEL B LASKY ALTERA LAW GROUP LLC220 South Sixth Street1700 US Bank Place SouthMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | headwear and articles of clothing namely, underwear, boxer shorts, outerwear, namely, shirts, trousers, sweaters, skirts, dresses, coats, jackets, suits, T-shirts, polo shirts, rugby shirts, polo sweaters, jogging pants, parkas, pilot jackets, zip-off jackets, coaches jackets, wind resistant jackets, sports jackets, shorts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 10, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Polyconcept U.S.A., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Polyconcept U.S.A., Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PF CONCEPT INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Polyconcept U.S.A., Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named US BASIC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 2, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2003 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 14, 2003 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2002 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2002 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2002 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2001 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2001 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 16, 1999 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 2, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 29, 1998 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 27, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 7, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |