USPTO serial 75213544
INDIAN WELLS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INDIAN WELLS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CATHERINE T DOYLE
CATHERINE T DOYLE DOYLE LAWSTE A1503470 MT DIABLO BLVDLAFAYETTE, CA 94549Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | non-alcoholic beverages and drinking water, namely, carbonated and non-carbonated drinking water, flavored carbonated water, natural drinking water, well drinking water, sparkling drinking water, spring water, artesian drinking water, mineral water, purified drinking water, and still drinking water | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2000 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 2000 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 1, 2000 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 26, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |