USPTO serial 75214263
THIRD AGE CAFE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, CHAD
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THIRD AGE CAFE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN W CRITTENDEN
JOHN W CRITTENDEN COOLEY GODWARD LLPONE MARITIME PLZ 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3580UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | dissemination of advertising for others via an online electronic communications network; online retail services, with a specialization in items for people fifty years of age and older | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services, namely, providing a computer database in the nature of computer bulletin boards and chat rooms, specifically designed for people fifty years of age of older; providing travel agency services, namely, making reservations and booking for temporary lodging | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by THIRD AGE MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by THIRD AGE MEDIA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Global Senior Network Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named THIRD AGE CAFE
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 20, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 25, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 15, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2001 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 29, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2000 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 6, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 13, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 13, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 6, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |