Drawing for PLEASURE IS SO CLOSE

USPTO serial 75214283

PLEASURE IS SO CLOSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DUBOIS, SUSAN L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLEASURE IS SO CLOSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PERLA M KUHN

PERLA M KUHN HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP1 BATTERY PK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029milk, milk products, namely, yogurt, creams, cheese, cottage cheese, yogurt-based food beverages, yogurt-based food beverages containing fruits; meat, fish, ham, poultry, game, sausages, meat frankfurters, not sold as sandwiches, salami, bacons, mini-cooked pork meat appetizers; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, jam, jelly, soup, stewed fruits; canned food partially or wholly made of meat, fish, ham, poultry, game; preserved, dried, cooked, frozen or canned ready dishes, partially or wholly made of the aforesaid products; frozen cream and butterACTIVE—
030pudding, coffee, tea, cocoa, chocolate, sugar, rice, tapioca, flour, sweet or salted pies, pizza, sweet or salted tarts, plain, flavored or filled pasta, ready dishes partially or wholly made of pastry, bread, biscuits, crackers, cakes, pastries, all these products being plain, coated, filled or flavored ones; candy, ice cream, honey, salt, mustard, vinegar, sauces, spicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 13, 2002EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2002EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 4, 2001EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2001EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 28, 2001EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2001EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 13, 2000EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 20, 2000EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 27, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 20, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 20, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 6, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 5, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 27, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 20, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 11, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 9, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 23, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance