Drawing for LARKIO THARPIO

USPTO serial 75214821

LARKIO THARPIO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEORGE, ANIL V
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LARKIO THARPIO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ROBERT C WEISS

PATENT PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE555 W FIFTH ST STE 4600LOS ANGELES, CA 90013-1025UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035promoting the goods and services of others by preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic magazine accessed through a global or other computer network or in multimedia CD-ROM, radio, or hard copy media; promoting the goods and services of artists and musical artists by preparing and placing advertisements in an electronic magazine accessed through a global or other computer network or in multimedia CD-ROM, radio, or hard copy media; computerized on-line retail and distributorship services featuring compact discs, records, tapes, T-shirts, lithographs, handicraftsACTIVE—
037installation of computer networks and computer systems for othersACTIVE—
038electronic mail services; broadcasting radio and video programs over a global computer networkACTIVE—
042computer services, namely, designing and maintaining and implementing web sites and pages for others; providing on-line chat room facilities for real time interaction with other computer users concerning topics of general interest; design of database, web page, information control, technical interface, data control, and other application software for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 7, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2001ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 31, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 10, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Oct 13, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 7, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 13, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 21, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 24, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 2, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 19, 1998CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 6, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 2, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 12, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance