USPTO serial 75214846
AUTOSENSE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOLDEN, JAMES B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTOSENSE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK A THURMON
MARK A THURMON ARNOLD WHITE & DURKEEP O BOX 4433HOUSTON, TX 77210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | aftermarket automotive parts and accessories, namely, battery chargers, battery disconnects; microchip based fluid level sensors; master read-out unit comprising microchip, transmitter and receiver; microchip based object sensor for use in determining distance of objects from vehicle when backing up vehicle and alerting driver thereto; and emergency distress alert units comprising microchip which disengages vehicle battery and starter and/or dials police telephonically when activated | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 21, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |