Drawing for FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY

USPTO serial 75215519

FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PRICE, WANDA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

ELIZABETH G LOWRY

ELIZABETH G LOWRY SMITH GAMBRELL & RUSSELL LLPSTE 3100 PROMENADE II1230 PEACHTREE ST NEATLANTA, GA 30309-3592

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041training in plastic facial and reconstructive surgery techniques and practices and distributing course material in connection therewithACTIVE—
042association services, namely, promoting the interests of facial plastic surgeons and reconstructive surgeons; research in the field of plastic surgery and reconstructive surgery and related basic sciences, namely, anatomy, pathology, biology, chemistry, physiology, and wound healingACTIVE—
200indicating membership in an association of facial plastic and reconstructive surgeonsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 9, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 30, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 30, 2002EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 14, 2001CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 13, 2000JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 13, 2000EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Nov 23, 1999REINREINSTATED—
Sep 30, 1999ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 25, 1999CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 3, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 4, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 9, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance