Drawing for MILOS PSARO-TAVERNA

USPTO serial 75215908

MILOS PSARO-TAVERNA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
DWYER, SEAN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MILOS PSARO-TAVERNA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029processed foods, namely, olive oil and olivesACTIVE
042restaurant servicesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 24, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 20, 2002EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Feb 21, 2002ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Feb 20, 2002EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Oct 2, 2001CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED
Aug 15, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 2, 2001JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 2, 2001EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 17, 2000CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 18, 2000CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 18, 1999CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 3, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jan 27, 1999DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Aug 25, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 28, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 2, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance