USPTO serial 75216795
CAMBRIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CAMBRIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | door lites, namely, glass or plastic inserts for doors | ACTIVE | Mar 26, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 5, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2000 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 17, 1999 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 30, 1998 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 8, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 21, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 1998 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1997 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |