USPTO serial 75216858
TURBO TUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2512916Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 27, 2001
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TURBO TUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Columbus, OH
Columbus, OH
Columbus, OH
Columbus, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul F. Kilmer
Paul F. Kilmer Holland & Knight LLP2099 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.Suite 100Washington, DC 20006Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ice cream and frozen confections | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Norse Dairy Systems, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Norse Dairy Systems, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Norse Dairy Systems, L.P.
- Other trademarks owned by Norse Dairy Systems, L.P.
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named TURBO TUBE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Dec 14, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 20, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 19, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 27, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2000 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 27, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 1999 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 10, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 14, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 30, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 6, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 14, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 12, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 1997 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 21, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |