USPTO serial 75217920
SLOPPY JOE'S
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRESSEY, MONTIA GIVENS
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLOPPY JOE'S?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN CYRIL MALLOY
JOHN CYRIL MALLOY HISTORIC CORAL WAYMALLOY & MALLOY PA2800 SW 3RD AVEMIAMI, FL 33129Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | coconut dips, jellies, jams, fruit preserves, plain potato chips, non-spicy chowders, and non-spicy flavored edible oils | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | pre-packaged food, namely, plain mustard, key lime juice for cooking, key lime sauce, sour orange sauce, coconut sauce, non-spicy cheese sauce, cookies, candies, cakes, pies, plain corn chips, plain tortilla chips, coconut batters, mayonnaise, crackers, pretzels, pasta | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | mixes for making soft drinks and fruit drinks, fruit juices and soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SLOPPY JOE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by SLOPPY JOE'S INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named SLOPPY JOE'S
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2001 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2001 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2000 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2000 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2000 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2000 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 1999 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 1999 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 13, 1998 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 1998 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 15, 1998 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 21, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |